{"id":40,"date":"2007-01-14T23:43:53","date_gmt":"2007-01-15T09:43:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pananadesign.com\/blog\/2007\/01\/14\/dmoz-is-dying-to-the-sound-of-applause\/"},"modified":"2020-04-03T15:28:24","modified_gmt":"2020-04-04T01:28:24","slug":"dmoz-is-dying-to-the-sound-of-applause","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pananadesign.com\/blog\/2007\/01\/14\/dmoz-is-dying-to-the-sound-of-applause\/","title":{"rendered":"DMOZ Is Dying &#8211; To The Sound Of Applause"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If you were on the Internet in the Late 90&#8217;s, and even recent years, you probably knew about the DMOZ.<\/p>\n<p>You might have also known it under the name &#8216;Open Directory Project&#8217;. This directory has been a thorn in the sides of search engine marketers for quite a while. Myself included.<\/p>\n<p>Why all the hostility? Google counted a link\/listing in the DMOZ very heavily when ranking sites. The directory was run and edited by volunteers, normally a laudable effort.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, like many of these types of projects, the directory was hijacked by its own editors. At least in certain areas.<\/p>\n<p>It was not uncommon for an Editor to block competitors from being listed in the directory, thereby denying them any boost in ranking that they might have gotten.<\/p>\n<p>For example, one alleged example was a lawyer who saw to it that no other attorney was given space in the section he ruled over. All search engine benefit was reserved for him, and him alone.<\/p>\n<p>An editor could always claim that their competitor&#8217;s site was not one of &#8216;quality&#8217;, giving them a cover for the real reason behind the rejection. There were even cases where an editor&#8217;s site had multiple listings.<\/p>\n<p>As you can guess, this was supposed to be against the rules of the DMOZ.<\/p>\n<p>Add into that mix the deluge of listing requests by everyone trying to up their Google rank and you have a backlog that rivals the line for Pink Floyd tickets back in the day. But with less &#8216;wacky tobbacky&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>Basically you made a submission and then forgot about it. The official line was that the wait was 3 to 6 months before a listing would go up.<\/p>\n<p>If it was accepted. Any efforts to check up would get the standard &#8216;We&#8217;re working on it&#8217; retort. Most people never saw their submission accepted.<\/p>\n<p>That would have been okay if there had been some oversight; and if Google hadn&#8217;t given them so much influence. Unfortunately, it bred contempt and link greed.<\/p>\n<p>Any complaint about editors was met with the &#8216;sour grapes&#8217; argument. That was valid in some cases, but not all.<\/p>\n<p>It seems that the DMOZ is finally on its way out. It is rarely, if ever, updated today. Then again, that&#8217;s how it always was. But it doesn&#8217;t have much influence on your Google\/Search engine ranking now.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a lesson for the open-source\/user-provided content world. It&#8217;s a great concept and it does work. Sometimes. But there needs to be some kind of check and balance system in place.<\/p>\n<p>For now &#8211; let me say &#8216;Good Riddance, to you, DMOZ, and to all your sand-bagging editors&#8217;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you were on the Internet in the Late 90&#8217;s, and even recent years, you probably knew about the DMOZ. You might have also known it under the name &#8216;Open Directory Project&#8217;. This directory has been a thorn in the sides of search engine marketers for quite a while. Myself included. Why all the hostility? [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"content_audit":[110,105,111],"class_list":["post-40","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-other","content_audit-audited","content_audit-outdated","content_audit-redirect-to-better-post"],"modified_by":"Jonathan Cook","jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pananadesign.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pananadesign.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pananadesign.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pananadesign.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pananadesign.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.pananadesign.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":639,"href":"https:\/\/www.pananadesign.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40\/revisions\/639"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pananadesign.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pananadesign.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pananadesign.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40"},{"taxonomy":"content_audit","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pananadesign.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content_audit?post=40"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}